Good chart, bad chart - BioTuring's Blog
  • Solutions

      For single-cell sequencing data

    • BioTuring Single Cell Browser
      • What is it?
      • Download
      • Request a quote/demo
      • Document
      • FAQ
    • Hera-T
    • For RNA sequencing data

    • Hera
    • Other solutions

    • BioVinci
    • Bioinformatics partnerships
  • Resources
    • Webinars
    • Blog
    • Videos
  • Forum
    • Profile
    • Setting
    • Log out
  • navigation
    • About us

    • Solutions

        For single-cell sequencing data

      • BioTuring Single Cell Browser
        • What is it?
        • Download
        • Request a quote/demo
        • Document
      • Hera-T
      • For RNA sequencing data

      • Hera
      • Other solutions

      • BioVinci
      • Bioinformatics partnerships
    • Resources

      • Webinars
      • Blog
      • Videos
    • Forum

    • Careers

    • Contact us

    Log in| Sign up
    1. Home
    2. Data visualization and analysis
    3. Good chart, bad chart

    BioTuring's Blog

    Data analysis made easy. For biologists, especially.

    6,000,000 cells
    at ease with
    BioTuring Browser
    Explore now
    Data visualization and analysis

    Good chart, bad chart

    by biomembers • April 26, 2018 November 14, 2018
    chartjunk, good and bad charts

    When it comes to presenting data, visuals are your friend, or so we all heard. Tables are better than large blocks of text and numbers. Graphs and charts are better than tables. Then it becomes irresistible to enliven your graphs and charts with colors, patterns, grid lines, labels, and the likes. The more visual they are, the better, right?

    Not quite.

    There are good and bad charts. The ultimate purpose of a chart or a graph is to convey information from the data. When the extra bells and whistles don’t tell the viewers anything new, they are called chartjunk. At best, they are a harmless waste of ink. At worst, they become distractions. It is a fine line between an effective visual illustration and a confusing one.

    Here’s a few tips to not fall over that line.

    1. Forgo cross-hatching

    When colors are not an option, we tend to go for cross-hatching. To differ among groups, we pack bar charts and pie charts with patterns: parallel lines, dense parallel lines, parallel lines that run the opposite directions… Cross-hatching has become so common in scientific graphs, you can spot so many of them on major journals.

    Beware: Cross-hatching can cause the so-called moiré effects to your charts: confusing viewers with illusional movements and vibration. In other words, your charts will give viewers a headache instead of information from your data.

    Cross-hatching is a prime example of chartjunk: excess ink that reveals no quantitative information. Chartjunk overwhelms your visual illustrations with unnecessary details. Edward Tufte even came up with a mathematical way to describe this: the data-ink ratio. It is the ratio of meaningful ink to total ink in a chart, and the larger it is, the better.

    The ultimate purpose of a chart or a graph is to convey information from the data.

    To remove junk from your charts, use alternatives that require less ink than cross-hatching but still retain the information. Like grayscale, as in the example below.

    Figure 1. Same data, different displays. Instead of cross-hatching, try the grayscale.

    Or a table. It can present the same data without the dizziness from moiré effect.

    Figure 2. Same data, different displays. The bar chart (left) is full of junk elements and moire effects: overused cross-hatching, overcrowded space tick marks, poor labels in abbreviations and uppercase. Instead, you can tell the same story in a table (right).

    2. Tone down the grid

    The grid came from the dark old days when you had to graph your data by hand. Graph paper has printed grid lines to guide your eyes. Instinctively, now you want to use the grid when presenting a graph, too. You’d think it will help viewers estimate and compare values more easily. Instead of gearing up with a ruler, they can trace along the grid lines.

    In fact, grid lines can be counterproductive: they clutter up the graphs without adding any information (and therefore are another type of chartjunk). Dark and bold grids are even worse. They conceal your data points, which should have been in the spotlight.

    So, when plotting graphs, try to omit the grids if they contribute nothing. If you find grids essential, it’s better to tone them down. Thinning the grids, making them muted relative to the data, will help. Keep in mind that your data are the main characters of the entire visualization.

    Figure 2: Bold grids vs. muted grids. Overwhelming grids make it hard to read the graph. In this example, the vertical grid lines are completely redundant. The data shows more clearly after omitting the vertical lines and toning down the horizontal ones.

    3. The bottom line

    Charts and graphs are ways to visualize data and they should do exactly that: draw viewers’ attention into the data and their stories. Dressing them up with chunky details can backfire. Try to cut down cross-hatching patterns and go for better codings, like grayscale, tables, or plain-Jane text. Clear the grids, or have them muted if possible. Don’t waste ink on chartjunk. When it comes to creating a good chart, less is more.

    “Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.”

    — Antoine de Saint-Exupery.

    To create better charts, try BioVinci, our drag-and-drop visualization tool. It lets you customize patterns and gridlines for more effective charts with ease. Give it a try!

    Reference: Tufte, Edward R., (2001). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, Conn. :Graphics Press

    #goodandbadcharts

    PREVIOUS POST
    BioVinci: a drag-and-drop tool for data visualization
    NEXT POST
    Log base 2 or e or 10?

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Recent Posts
    • Explore 10X Visium Spatial Transcriptomics data at ease with BioTuring Browser November 9, 2020
    • A tiny world inside non-small cell lung cancer revealed by single-cell omics: 35 cell types, and their marker genes October 20, 2020
    • The Why, When and How of 3D PCA October 12, 2020
    • 6 best box and whisker plot makers September 18, 2020
    • Immunoglobulin genes up-regulated in lung adenocarcinoma infiltrating T cells: A report from BioTuring lung cancer single cell database September 8, 2020
    Categories
    • BioTuring Cellpedia
    • Data visualization and analysis
      • Box plots
      • Heatmap
      • Principal component analysis
      • Venn diagrams
      • Violin plots
    • RNA-seq data analysis
    • Single Cell Analysis
    • Single-cell RNA-seq tutorials
    • Visium Spatial Transcriptomics Analysis
    Subscribe now
    6,000,000 cells
    at ease with
    BioTuring
    Browser
    Explore now

    We are here to help

    Navigation

    About us
    Contact us
    FAQ
    Blog
    Webinar
    Video
    © 2019 BioTuring. All rights reserved